Nevertheless, healthcare inflation is not particularly robust to different measures, unlike rent inflation. Indeed, in the PCE (personal consumption expenditures) index, which is the US Federal Reserve's benchmark, the rise is significantly smaller (as the European equivalent of this index is less used, we focus on the CPI). This phenomenon, which is still recent and little documented, should therefore be assessed with caution.
The need to integrate the property cycle into inflation analysis.
This blog does not recommend using an index that excludes rents (nor an index excluding rents and healthcare costs): it would provide little information in itself as it only includes a very limited part of consumer goods and services. Nevertheless, this comparison shows that the majority of the domestic inflation rate differential between the United States and the euro area since 2012 can be explained by differences in rent developments and, more recently, healthcare.
While the economic recovery has indeed been at a more advanced stage in the United States than in the euro area since 2012, the faster growth in inflation on the other side of the Atlantic is primarily due to the recovery of its real estate market. Therefore, it is advisable to take account of the analysis of real estate markets together with the analysis of economic cycles in inflation comparisons. In addition, from a methodological point of view, it is important to continue examining the way in which the differences in the share of rents in the price indices between Europe and the United States can influence the observed inflation differential. Developments are underway to also integrate owner equivalent rent (i.e. an equivalent amount of rent that would be paid for a currently owned house) in the European price indices (see Box 4, p. 47, of the ECB Economic Bulletin, 2016, vol. 8).